Fighting men of Simon de Montfort's campaigns
|
Monday April 11, 2005
|
 |
There were very few
true knights at this time and the bulk of
cavalry on both sides would have been made up of
younger sons, sergeants, squires
and mercenaries. Knights would wear
a long mail coat or hauberk
and may also have worn a coat of plates
(leather or padded fabric reinforced with metal
plates). By the middle of the thirteenth century
the knight's arms and legs would have been protected by mail and he would
have worn a mail hood or "coif" over a padded "arming cap". Other
cavalry would have worn lighter, simpler or recycled armour. Knights
would have worn a
surcoat over their armour with their
coat of arms applied to the surcoat. Their
arms might also be present on the covering or
"barding" for the horse. Other horses would have
had leather barding. |
|
 |
Helmets would have been
plain open-faced, or flat-topped
or the well known barrel-shaped great
helm. The trend towards smaller shields continued
during this period with the large kite-shaped Shields
characteristic of the Normans giving way to the
later medieval "heater"
(triangular) shield, although all sorts of
shields, antique and up to date, would have appeared on the battlefield.
Plate armour was sometimes seen,
often used to protect the knight's knees and
elbows. Plates of armour might be made of
boiled leather instead of metal. |
|
 |
Sergeants (from the Latin for "servant") were
professional soldiers trained
and experienced in the horseman's skills.
They tended to be better protected than infantry though
not as well protected as the knights. They generally wore
mail hauberks - maybe shorter than the knight's - and,
like the knights, would fight dismounted and would ride with the
knights. They bore no coat of arms
(although they may have worn a lord's "livery") and horses were
usually undecorated and
unprotected. |
|
 |
Mid-thirteenth century armies consisted mainly of
infantry and spearmen of one kind or another
were the main type of infantry of the
day. Spears, bills and
axes were carried. A professional
infantryman would wear mail if he could afford it but would certainly wear
a quilted leather "jack"
or jerkin made of metal plates rivetted to a quilted
fabric garment. Helmets
were open-faced, wide-brimmed
kettle helms or simple
"pots". |
|
 |
Longbows were found (more
among the Welsh than among the English) but the doctrine of massed archery
that won Crecy and Poitiers was in the future.
Bowman - longbows or shortbows
- wore little or no armour. |
|
 |
Peasant
levies were often armed with improvised weapons (a felling axe, a scythe
or a pitchfork made a serviceable weapon) and a may not even have
worn a leather jerkin. Some peasants may have
been armed with bows. |
|
 |
Town
"militias" would have had some drill and
have been more willing
to fight than peasants, having more to protect.
Their appearance would be similar to rank and
file infantrymen but with poorer equipment.
|
|
 |
Crossbowmen were the most common missile-armed soldiers
of the day and both sides are likely to have used some.
Crossbows were expensive and the province of
mercenaries, so the crossbowmen would be at
least as well equipped as regular infantrymen. |